Mill City Times is a not-for-profit community service. We do not sell advertising on this site.
Community Partners
Thanks to our community partners, whose support makes Mill City Times possible:
MILL CITY FARMERS MARKET
With over 100 local farmers, food makers and artists, MCFM strives to build a local, sustainable and organic food economy in a vibrant, educational marketplace.
Maximizing the visitor experience of Minneapolis for the economic benefit of our community, making Minneapolis the destination of choice among travelers.
Covering life, work, and play in the Historic Mill District and Downtown Minneapolis Riverfront neighborhoods. Have an opinion, local news or events to share? Contact us.
A native Minnesotan, Leon does expressive art for your interpretation. His themes include landscapes, water, flora, music and time in acrylics, metallic leaf, copper foil, vivid color, texture & depth. For the Sanctuary show, he has chosen to share four of his favorite places: a Florida marina, a Hawaiian volcano, the past through Grecian arches and an impression of Paris.
StoryCorpscollects stories for their weekly broadcast on NPR's "Morning Edition”, and now you have an opportunity to share your own story.
StoryCorps is an independent nonprofit whose mission is to provide Americans of all backgrounds and beliefs the opportunity to record, share, and preserve the stories of our lives. Since 2003, StoryCorps has collected and archived more than 30,000 interviews from more than 60,000 participants. This project is funded with money from Minnesota's Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund.
They are hosting an informative meeting on Thursday, June 2, at 7:00pm. The location is Pohlad Hall at the Central Library, 300 Nicollet.
If you have a few minutes in your day, take time to listen to some of the clips. These are everyday people sharing stories that range from humerous to heartbreaking.
We recently received a postcard from Above the Falls Sports reminding us that boating season is here.
They are currently offering special pricing on Boathouse memberships, which ensures availability of boats in the premier urban boathouse. For more information, call 612-825-8983 or email info@abovethefallssports.com.
Above the Falls Sports offers:
- Group tours (short, half-day, full day, picinic and supper cruise) - Boat handling instruction - Boat rentals - Boats sales (new and used)
Rain fell for the second week in a row at the Mill City Farmers Market, but there are just too many wonderful things available to miss out on for even one weekend.
Last year was our first full year visiting the MCFM, and we actually purchased way more from the artists than food vendors. For food, I always stuck to the basics - greens, tomatoes, herbs, a loaf of bread or block of cheese. But this year, my goal is to have tried EVERYTHING by the time October 15 rolls around.
I've got my fingers crossed that the sun will shine down on next week's market. But rain or shine - hope to see you there! YUM!
People Serving People (PSP), located at 614 South 3rd Street, provides emergency housing and community services that assist families experiencing homelessness in becoming self-sufficient and reconnected with the community.
On Monday, May 23, many of PSP's staff will be at the Convention Center to assist with the semi-annual Project Homeless Connect event. Their staff will also manage the children's center during the event.
Project Homeless Connect, based on a nationally implemented best practice, is a one-stop service center of comprehensive support services for people experiencing homelessness.
The last event on December 13, 2010, was also held at the Convention Center and utilized more than 160,000 square feet of the facility. At that event, an astounding 125 separate service agencies provided a continuum of services that included mental and chemical health care, employment training and placement, comprehensive medical and dental care, haircuts, ID assistance, and voicemail services. Over 500 service providers and 1,000 volunteers helped more than 1,900 individuals obtain services.
According to their website, Project Homeless Connect is a service delivery model that has consistently been proven to be crucial in eliminating barriers to housing, employment, education, and the myriad other factors that contribute to long-term homelessness.
On May 19, Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak and American Academy of Neurology celebrated groundbreaking of the Academy's new headquarters across from the Guthrie Theater. The American Academy of Neurology is the world’s largest professional association of neurologists with more than 24,000 members and is the largest trade association in the Twin Cities.
Below, Mayor Rybak, Catherine M. Rydell, CAE, Executive Director and CEO of the American Academy of Neurology, Bruce Sigsbee, MD, FAAN, President of the American Academy of Neurology, Minneapolis City Council Member Lisa Goodman, and Minneapolis City Council President Barbara Johnson perform the ceremonial groundbreaking:
As part of the celebration, a press conference was held to announce the Academy’s donation of 1,000 children’s bike helmets to the upcoming Bike Fests that start Saturday in North Minneapolis.
These helmets were also available to everyone attending the ceremony.
The five-story, 62,000 square foot building is the first substantial office building to be constructed in downtown Minneapolis in the past 10 years. Features will include a sensory garden, rooftop terrace and a system of power outlets on the building's exterior to provide electricity to the Mill City Farmers Market.
The American Academy of Neurology is currently based in St. Paul. A neurologist is a doctor with specialized training in diagnosing, treating and managing disorders of the brain and nervous system such as Alzheimer’s disease, stroke, migraine, multiple sclerosis, brain injury, Parkinson’s disease and epilepsy.
The public comment portion of the Minneapolis Park Board meeting kicked off last night with the representative of Crown Hydro leading off his remarks with a scathing, indirect insult:
"When I first became involved with this project I was told it was a fools errand...that trust in the Minneapolis Park Board is trust misplaced."
He then went on to reject the Park Board's revised proposal as "not commercially viable" and "not commercially reasonable".
When it was my turn to speak I offered the following to the Board:
President Erwin, Commissioners,
My name is David Tinjum, thank you for allowing me to speak tonight on the topic of Crown Hydro.
This project has changed dramatically subsequent to the last board meeting on May 4, 2011.
In some regards you have made great strides to clarify and mitigate troubling aspects of this project - I commended you for your work.
However, more work remains, not the least of which is creating an up-to-date financial analysis of the proposed joint venture.
I'm here to ask you to table this resolution until such time you have performed due diligence commensurate with the scale, complexity and risk this project represents.
Thank you
The Board, which was scheduled to vote on the proposal, instead passed a motion removing the issue from the agenda.
What does this mean for the project? At this point it's too early to tell. Crown Hydro could just go away, but given the history of this project, that seems unlikely. They could take legal action against the Board. or, they could continue their efforts at the State House and Senate to pass a bill forcing the park Board to give them Nationally Historic Parkland under threat of having their funding cut off.
Stay tuned. On Monday we'll publish an in-depth breakdown of the project and the "unreasonable" proposal from the Park Board.
Update on Thursday, May 19, 2011 at 1:03PM by
David Tinjum
Clarification to quote from Crown Hydro representative, based on the video transcript of the meeting:
"when we engaged in this conversation back in March, there were a lot of people who told me that trying to work out a deal on this project is a fool's errand and it'll never get done...any trust placed in the Park Board is missplaced..."
Last night we enjoyed the 'In the Mood for Munsingwear' book signing event with Susan Marks at the Mill City Museum.
The program started with a performance by a costumed History Player portraying Eva Valesh, a journalist for the St. Paul Globe in the 1880s who exposed working conditions for women Minneapolis factories, including Munsingwear’s predecessor, Northwestern Knitting Company:
In her new book, "In the Mood for Munsingwear: Minnesota’s Claim to Underwear Fame," Susan Marks shows how the history of the company and its ad campaigns reveal a great deal about America’s changing mores. Through photos and anecdotes, Susan covered working conditions and labor relations and how they affected the people who worked at Munsingwear, the underwear manufacturer founded in Minneapolis in 1887. It was once the nation’s largest manufacturer of underwear.
In response to poor public image, increased union activity and safety concerns after the fatal Triangle Shirtwaist Company Fire of 1911, Munsingwear built a mammoth "fire proof" manufacturing facility (the present-day International Market Square) and implemented numerous employee programs.
A few examples are sponsored employee sports, on-site health and dental staff, music, on-site library, and an employee-run newspaper. Despite all the improvements there were disgruntled employees, such as a fellow in shipping who took to selling stolen underwear. He was caught, thanks to "Operative 71".
It was interesting to see their advertising morph from innocent to outright racy:
Several former employees of Munsingwear shared their own stories. The gentleman pictured below brought in a manual slide ruler used for calculating the amount of cloth required for each size garment. He also shared some sample leisure suits.
Another former employee explained how her "piecemeal" position at Munsingwear in the early 70's led to a career in international undergarment design, including the likes of Victoria's Secret.
Afterwards, Susan signed copies of her current book, as well as her 2005 book, "Finding Betty Crocker". Both are available for sale in the Mill City Museum gift shop.
The exhibit, "Underwear - A Brief History" is currently on display at the Minnesota History Center in St. Paul.
Show your opposition to this project, show up at the Minneapolis Park Board meeting tonight to find out what will happen to St. Anthony Falls and Mill Ruins Park. Show the Park Board you're paying attention.
From: THOMAS R DIMOND <tdimond@q.com> Date: May 18, 2011 11:43:32 AM CDT To: ednab <ednab@mac.com> Subject:Comments to the Minneapolis Parks Board
Tom Dimond
2119 Skyway Drive
Saint Paul, MN 55119
May 16, 2011
RE: Crown Hydro
Thank you for the opportunity to provide input on the proposed letter of intent. It is difficult to comment with specificity, detail or accuracy because the proposal has changed in design and nature so many times it is not entirely clear what the current proposal includes. This limits the ability of the public to provide informed input. It limits the ability of Commissioners to analyze and discuss this project with your colleagues and constituents before embarking on a course of action that could negatively impact the river and tie the hands of future Commissioners for 99 years. Within the context of these limits I would like to offer these comments about the latest proposal.
The water supply for Saint Anthony Falls should not be sold.
The Mississippi River is known as the Father of Waters or as Annie refers to it as Grandfather Mississippi. It is the most important river and flyway in North America. This area would not be a National Park if it were not for the river. After all, it is the Mississippi National River and Recreational Area. It is also the State designated Mississippi River Critical Area.
Along the full length of this majestic river there is only one waterfall. Minnesota and Minneapolis are fortunate to be home to this valuable asset. Protecting the source of water for the falls is of paramount importance.
The public water supply for the falls should not be sold for private gain. Protecting the public water supply for the water fall is a public trust. It is hard to imagine any public official would even consider selling the water supply of the falls. The Parks Board is entrusted with protecting Grandfather Mississippi.
There is no alternative to the waterfall.
There is no alternative source of water for Saint Anthony Falls. There is no alternative waterfall on the Mississippi River. There are many alternatives to generate 3.2 MW of energy. If Crown Hydro is not constructed the grant money will be awarded to an alternative renewable energy project. Why would the Parks Board reduce or eliminate the flow of water over Saint Anthony Falls to generate 3.2 MW of electricity?
Crown Hydro proposes to generate 3.2 MW. The Nobles wind farm generates 201 MW and Grand Meadow 100 MW. Excel has 1,491 MW of wind power. Biomass generates 193 MW.
Conversion from coal to natural gas provides cleaner energy. Riverside generates 511 MW and High Bridge 570 MW. At Black Dog the 253 MW coal facility, is being replaced with a 688 MW natural gas facility. The increase in capacity is 453 MW.
Conservation is the best alternative to increased production. If there is going to be an increase in production, it would take 62 Crown Hydro projects to produce what one wind farm generates. It would take 178 Crown Hydro projects to generate what the High Bridge plant can generate.
There are many alternatives to produce this small amount of energy but there is no alternative to water for the waterfall. It is the only waterfall in the National Park and the only waterfall on the Mississippi River.
The waterfall is not an amusement park attraction that you turn on and off.
The Parks Board should be commended for requiring a minimum of 2,000 cubic feet per second of water for the falls. Many would rightly make the case that no water should be diverted from the falls. Reducing the flow of water diminishes the majesty of the falls. The sound, turbulence and spray from the falls directly relates to the flow of water over the falls. Any dewatering or diminishing of the falls is ill advised.
Past decision have had a cumulative effect of dewatering the falls. The Parks Board should not abandon the minimum requirement of water over the falls. The letter of intent only requires the minimum flow during prime viewing periods. The stated reason for this change is the project is not economically viable if 2,000 cfs of water goes over the falls. The Parks Board is responsible for protecting the river.
The Parks Board should not bailout troubled investments.
The public spoke loud and clear that they did not appreciate the government bailout of bad investments on Wall Street. The public is unlikely to appreciate the Parks Board creating a troubled asset relief program. The falls should not be allowed to dry up because a proposed project is not financially viable. If the project is not financially viable then it should not be built.
Conflict of interest
The Parks Board creates a real potential for conflict of interest if it takes a financial stake in an investment that is financially unviable due to Board policy. The report from the Superintendent states that Crown has indicated that with a Park Board minimum requirement of 2,000 cfs over the falls at all times the project loses viability. The minimum requirement of water flowing over the falls should not be based on whether the Board gets a financial ownership interest in the business. In particular, the size of the ownership interest the Parks Board receives should not be based on the Parks Board decision of minimum water flow over the falls. Webster’s Dictionary defines bribe as something that serves to induce or influence. The Parks Board should not take an ownership stake in an investment it regulates. The Parks Board should continue to support a minimum 2,000 CFS of water over the falls.
If Crown Hydro is allowed to take 1,000 cfs the falls will run dry 135 days of the year.
The current water demand is 3,700 cfs. Allowing Crown Hydro to remove an additional 1,000 cfs will leave the falls dry 37% of the days or 135 days a year. The Wenk report shows that existing demand already drops flow over the falls to 1,000 cfs or less on 37% of the days (1931-2003). If you remove another 1,000 cfs there is no water left for the falls.
Cumulative potential effects
The environmental review must take into account cumulative potential effects or cumulative impacts. The reduction of flow over the falls must also consider the cumulative impacts of other diversions of water. The impacts of other Hydro projects at Saint Anthony Falls must be considered. In 2006, the Minnesota Supreme Court elevated the obligation of RGU’s to address in the environmental review cumulative potential effects. Cumulative potential effects also must be considered in the decision on the need for an EIS.
The Parks Board should require an EIS.
An EIS is a likely outcome and agreeing to an EIS can expedite the process and better inform the Board and public. The EIS is a thorough study of the project’s environmental impacts and a comprehensive analysis of its economic and sociological effects. It considers reasonable alternatives, including the “no build alternative”. When completed, the review gives the government and general public information to determine whether the project is environmentally acceptable and what mitigation measures are needed. The EAW is a procedure that uses a worksheet with a standardized list of questions to screen projects that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. We should all be able to agree that dewatering the only falls on the Mississippi River and excavation and construction in a National Registered Historic District located in a National Park may have the potential for significant environmental effects.
Limit any proposed lease or agreement to 2049.
The FERC license is set to expire in 2049. Any proposed agreements should expire in 38 years not 99 years. This allows future Commissioners to evaluate if a new lease or agreement is still appropriate in 2049.
The Parks Board should remove itself from any negotiations until the sale is complete and there is a new owner.
The Parks Board risks making statements that a potential buyer of Crown Hydro might rely on. It is also difficult for the Board and public to evaluate the viability of the owner to implement an agreement when you do not know who the buyer is.
The Parks Board should not be intimidated by bad legislation.
This session the DNR was told if they want money for State Parks and Forests they should cut down and sell the Walnut trees. To the DNR’s credit they pointed out that cutting the trees in the parks was less profitable than many think, and that loss of the trees diminishes the values of the parks they are entrusted to protect. The Parks Board was told by some in the Legislature that you should sell the water that flows over the falls. The response should be the same as the DNR. The Parks Board is entrusted to protect the flow over the falls and any potential financial gains are short sighted when you consider the loss to our National Park.
Any agreements must be conditioned on a new programmatic agreement.
The previous agreement is 13 years old and based on a different site. All parties, including the public, should have an opportunity to evaluate and provide input on any new impacts and what should be included in the programmatic agreement.
The 1998 agreement raised questions if the project can be done without loss of the historic resource.
SHPO states that if the historic races can be reused by repairing the in-place historic materials and following the Secretary of Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, Crown Hydro’s proposal may be acceptable. It goes on to say that if in order to use the races, all the historic material needs to be removed and new races built with new material in the approximate same locations, the historic resource would be lost. There has been discussion of building a new concrete and steel race to replace one of the races, and reconstructing another race with new material in order to widen and deepen it. The current packet of information does not provide information on what actual construction impacts are proposed in 2011. The 1998 agreement must be replaced with a new 2011 agreement signed by all the parties.
The Library is now offering “JobNow,” a real-time online resumé and job interview coaching service.
The service is free, and all that’s needed is a Library card and Internet access to log on and connect with a carefully screened Job Coach. The Job Coach will offer resumé feedback, interview coaching, resources for your job search, along with other career tips.
In addition to the Central Library location, people can seek in-person help at four other Hennepin Library Jobs and Small Business Centers. They are located at Brookdale, East Lake, North Regional, and Southdale.
This is installament 1 of a 5 part series looking at the proposed Crown Hydro project. The State of Minnesota is attempting to force the Minneapolis Park Board to not only approve this project, but also provide Nationally Historic Parkland to a private developer.
It Could Be Just a Few Steps Away. Literally, and figuratively. It could happen as soon as this fall if the Minneapolis Park Board approves the controversial Crown Hydro project proposed to be built at the foot of the Stone Arch Bridge in the Minneapolis Riverfront.
Literally. The site of the proposed hydroelectric power plant is only steps away from the entrance to the Stone Arch Bridge.
Photo taken from the entrance to the Stone Arch Bridge
49 steps away to be exact. I counted. On Saturday, May 8, 2011 when Kim and I were taking photos at Mill Ruins Park. I’m not that tall, and my legs are kind of short, so it’s really close by.
Crown Hydro wants the Minneapolis Park Board to give them this Nationally Historic Parkland to build a hydroelectric power generation facility. It will be an underground facility. Which means:
They are going to have to dig a great big hole. A really, really big hole.
They will need lots of heavy equipment to dig that giant hole in the ground. That equipment needs room to operate. Outside of the hole.
They will needs tons of materials to build the power plant in that great big hole. It will need to be stored outside of the hole.
They will need a construction trailer, port-a-potty’s, space for workers to have their morning coffee, park their trucks, store more big equipment…you get the idea. All OUTSIDE the hole.
Hmm…Where will it all go? Will they allow bike riders and joggers and walkers and tourists to traverse through the middle of the construction site?
Crown Hydro has not made an specific commitment to keep the Stone Arch Bridge open during construction. They refuse to discuss details until they Park Board gives them the Parkland. Hmmm…
Figuratively. The Minneapolis Park Board is scheduled to vote on this project on Wednesday, May 18. If it passes, Crown Hydro, and the closing of the Stone Arch Bridge, could be just a few steps, and a few days away.
About This Series Kim and I walked down to check out the location of the Crown Hydro project located in Mill Ruins Park at St. Anthony Falls. The proximity to the Stone Arch Bridge and other important historical treasures surprised us, so I thought I'd take a rough measure - I'd "step it off". It was 49 steps from the center of the proposed Hydroelectric facility to the foot of the Stone Arch Bridge. I decided to dig a little deeper. This 5 part series is the result of that effort.
Sanctuary In this graciously restored fieldstone building, Sanctuary's menu spans the globe with new-age verve. Call it classic fusion-Latino and Asian flavors via French technique. Chef Patrick Atanalian's plates are surprisingly precise and balanced. Michael Kutscheid, polished maitre d' and co-owner, presides with enthusiasm and charm. Critics' Rating: 84
Sea Change The lure is sustainably sourced seafood prepared and served with the visual, textural, and flavor-packed flair that are the hallmarks of Tim McKee's restaurant concepts. Whether it's raw bar treats bursting with freshness, small plates boasting unorthodox combinations, or a full complement of non-fish entrees, the menu covers the waterfront. Toss in a remodeled interior that feels more open and casual than the former Cue, and some of the best service you'll find locally and you have a spot that's up to either pre-theater chumming or destination dining. Critics' Rating: 93
Spoonriver Brenda Langton's modern eatery is a chic place to sip exotic cocktails and dine on creative, seasonal, locally raised, chef-driven fare within a stone's throw of the Guthrie Theater. Innovative flavors and a focus on nonmeat offerings are hallmarks here. Critics' Rating: 83.3
This is installament 2 of a 5 part series looking at the proposed Crown Hydro project. The State of Minnesota is attempting to force the Minneapolis Park Board to not only approve this project, but also provide Nationally Historic Parkland to a private developer.
The Crown Hydro project at St. Anthony Falls and Mill Ruins Park, if approved, will give the developer the right to shut off St. Anthony Falls from September 22 through June 20 each year.
From Section 5 of the Letter of Intent being considered by the Minneapolis Park Board
stating the intent to keep St. Anthony Falls flowing at the rate of “2,000 cfs during the prime viewing periods, such best viewing periods, considered for purposes of this Letter of Intent as June 21 – September 21.”
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) License Article 404
“During low flows in July and August, the project will operate with up to 500 cfs during the daylight hours even if it dries up the falls . . . “
Will “St. Anthony Wet Cement” be the new name of this iconic symbol of Minneapolis?
Rather than being a year round attraction for walkers, runners, bikers (yes bikers) and tourists, seems we could have an amusement park type of attraction for the 3 months each year. Who’ll get to flip the switch to turn on the Falls each year on June 21? Maybe the developer can hold a lottery to increase his profits? Better yet, why not just move the whole attraction to Valley Fair, which happens to be in the district of Representative Michael Beard (R) District: 35A, sponsor of the Legislation that started this fiasco?
In all seriousness, St. Anthony Falls is the Historic Birthplace of Minneapolis, an iconic symbol of our City, and an important part of the daily lives of thousands of people both local and from all parts of the world. How did this absurd proposal even make it to this point? Will a dry falls be the legacy of MPRB Superintendant Miller, Board President John Erwin and the current Board?
Bottom line: The Minneapolis Park Board is scheduled to vote on this project on Wednesday, May 18. If it passes, Crown Hydro, and "St. Anthony Wet Cement", could be just a few steps, and a few days away.
About This Series Kim and I walked down to check out the location of the Crown Hydro project located in Mill Ruins Park at St. Anthony Falls. The proximity to the Stone Arch Bridge and other important historical treasures surprised us, so I thought I'd take a rough measure - I'd "step it off". It was 49 steps from the center of the proposed Hydroelectric facility to the foot of the Stone Arch Bridge. I decided to dig a little deeper. This 5 part series is the result of that effort.
This is installament 3 of a 5 part series looking at the proposed Crown Hydro project. The State of Minnesota is attempting to force the Minneapolis Park Board to not only approve this project, but also provide Nationally Historic Parkland to a private developer.
The Crown Hydro project at St. Anthony Falls and Mill Ruins Park, if approved, will result in a huge increase in the volume of water flowing into Mill Ruins Park through the historic tailrace.
Anyone who has spent time in this area of the park knows what this could mean. Would this area of the park be underwater? Will it have to be shut down for public safety?
The current Crown Hydro project to be voted on at the May 18 meeting of the Minneapolis Park Board makes no mention of this risk to Mill Ruins Park. Has anyone taken a step back to identify the potential risks of this project? We have no way of knowing how real this risk is until a thorough evaluation of this project is undertaken. At this point, sadly, none exists.
Bottom line: The Minneapolis Park Board is scheduled to vote on this project on Wednesday, May 18. If it passes, Crown Hydro, and a new underwater amusement attraction, could be just a few steps, and a few days away.
About This Series Kim and I walked down to check out the location of the Crown Hydro project located in Mill Ruins Park at St. Anthony Falls. The proximity to the Stone Arch Bridge and other important historical treasures surprised us, so I thought I'd take a rough measure - I'd "step it off". It was 49 steps from the center of the proposed Hydroelectric facility to the foot of the Stone Arch Bridge. I decided to dig a little deeper. This 5 part series is the result of that effort.
This is installament 4 of a 5 part series looking at the proposed Crown Hydro project. The State of Minnesota is attempting to force the Minneapolis Park Board to not only approve this project, but also provide Nationally Historic Parkland to a private developer.
The aftermath of the last ill-conceived effort to harness St. Anthony Falls
The risks to many Nationally Historic Ruins and public assets are real. Crown Hydro has refused to provide assurances that their project will not damage or destroy them. Don’t take my word on it, here’s some opinions from those much more knowledgeable than I:
The U.S. Army Corp of Engineers:
“The St. Anthony Falls District and the individual sites within it are among the primary reasons Congress established the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area. The proposed project would likely have significant adverse impacts on the nationally significant historic resources within the MISS corridor.”
United States Department of the Interior
“. . . is very concerned about potential project impacts on the historical resources of the St. Anthony Falls Historic District and with the flow of water over St Anthony Falls,, the only falls on the entire Mississippi River. . . may seriously impact the recreational use and visual integrity of this area.”
And...
“The proposed project would likely have significant adverse impacts on the nationally significant historic resources. . . “
Minnesota State Archeologist Scott Anfinson
"...the exit tunnel for this facility will adversely impact a significant historic structure, namely the historic tailrace tunnel system. The construction of the turbines could also prevent the restoration of the historic waterpower canal entrance should that be proposed in the future.”
Crown Hydro, LLC
“CHC acknowledges that its project may endanger MPRB owned historic facilities..."
There is nothing inherently bad about building a Hydro Plant in this area. If done after a thorough assessment and mitigation of the risks, and as part of the long term plan for the area, and for the public good, a Hydro facility could add to, rather than subtract from, the huge investment made in revitalizing this part of the Downtown Minneapolis Riverfront.
Bottom line: The Minneapolis Park Board is scheduled to vote on this project on Wednesday, May 18. If it passes, Crown Hydro, and the potential destruction of the Birthplace of Minneapolis, could be just a few steps, and a few days away.
About This Series Kim and I walked down to check out the location of the Crown Hydro project located in Mill Ruins Park at St. Anthony Falls. The proximity to the Stone Arch Bridge and other important historical treasures surprised us, so I thought I'd take a rough measure - I'd "step it off". It was 49 steps from the center of the proposed Hydroelectric facility to the foot of the Stone Arch Bridge. I decided to dig a little deeper. This 5 part series is the result of that effort.
This is final installament of a 5 part series looking at the proposed Crown Hydro project. The State of Minnesota is attempting to force the Minneapolis Park Board to not only approve this project, but also provide Nationally Historic Parkland to a private developer.
"You got ninety percent of the American public out there with little or no net worth. I create nothing. I own. We make the rules, pal. The news, war, peace, famine, upheaval, the price per paper clip. We pick that rabbit out of the hat while everybody sits out there wondering how the hell we did it. Now you're not naive enough to think we're living in a democracy, are you buddy? It's the free market."
"The point is, ladies and gentleman, that greed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right, greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit."
- Gordon Gekko
Given the multitude of unaswered questions, the unanimous opposition of Federal, State and local experts and the obvious unconstitutionality of the State Legislation driving this project, what motive could there be at the State level? Greed, power, trading favors or some other personal gain? Partisian politics? I can only speculate as to the possible motivation of State Legislators supporting HF1440 and SF1191.
More quotes, but from real people...
From Minneapolis City Council Member Lisa Goodman -
“It is simply outrageous that the Legislature would even attempt to override the decisions of local government, in this case the Park Board, and compel both the sale of public land and the planning approvals required for a private developer for their private development”
What’s next, the Legislature passing a bill ordering the city to sell the Minneapolis Farmers Market land for a Vikings Stadium or sell Gold Medal Park for a new high-rise?”
One of four representatives to take his name off the Crown Hydro bill, Rep. Michael Nelson, DFL-Brooklyn Park, said he supports the Crown Hydro project as a clean source of renewable energy but opposes taking away local control.
“The way that this one was written was basically clubbing the city of Minneapolis over the head,” Nelson said.
John S. Gulliver, P.E., Ph. D, Engineering Consultant
How will construction equipment be brought into this crowded area, without disrupting other traffic and activities? What will happen to the public parkways, walkways, etc. during the approximately two years of construction?
Educational value of the Crown Hydroelectric Plant: The Crown Hydroelectric project seems to be developed in isolation from other projects of the district. The interpretive character of the facility is pre-eminent in 2001 support letters from Minneapolis Mayor Sharon Sales Belton, Hennepin County Commissioner Peter McLaughlin, State Senator Lawrence Pogemiller, and State Representative Phyllis Kahn. New letters from representative individuals should be required by MRPB, since the obtained letters of support were based, in part or in whole, on the interpretive character of the Crown Hydroelectric project.
Nobody, But Nobody, Thinks This Is a Good Idea
Don’t take my word on it, here’s some opinions from those much more knowledgeable than I:
Walter F. Mondale
"I write today to urge that you, as a matter of public policy, conclude that the land you own in the most historically sacred area of our great City be simply off-limits to commercial development. Two projects have threatened to desecrate the most sensitive of land you own—namely the condominium project on the old Fuji Ya site, and the again-pending attempt to locate a hydro electric generation plant steps from the Mill Ruins. The latter proposal, no matter what the view of paid consultants, is inherently a taking of the public’s most historic property in this most historic area—the force of the falls over the St. Anthony apron."
"The historical area, of course, is called the St Anthony Falls Historic District. It is not called the Stone Arch Bridge Historic District, nor the Lock and Dam Historic District, nor the River Parkway Historic District, nor even the Mill Ruins Historic District. That which makes it historic, of course, is the Falls itself—the flow of water and its force."
The U.S. Army Corp of Engineers:
“The St. Anthony Falls District and the individual sites within it are among the primary reasons Congress established the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area. The proposed project would likely have significant adverse impacts on the nationally significant historic resources within the MISS corridor.”
Jessica Overmohle, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
"The Draft Plan does not address aesthetic flows over the spillway. The MDNR believes it is imperative that an adequate flow over the spill way be maintained. [It] is one of the only aspects of the St. Anthony Falls area that portrays the significance of the largest falls on the entire Mississippi River. The location in downtown Minneapolis creates a demand for viewing the falls 24 hours a day throughout the year."
United States Department of the Interior
“. . . is very concerned about potential project impacts on the historical resources of the St. Anthony Falls Historic District and with the flow of water over St Anthony Falls,, the only falls on the entire Mississippi River. . . may seriously impact the recreational use and visual integrity of this area.”
And...
“The proposed project would likely have significant adverse impacts on the nationally significant historic resources. . . “
Minnesota State Archeologist Scott Anfinson
"...the exit tunnel for this facility will adversely impact a significant historic structure, namely the historic tailrace tunnel system. The construction of the turbines could also prevent the restoration of the historic waterpower canal entrance should that be proposed in the future.”
Minneapolis City Attorney
“[Crown could] consume water to the point of elimination of flow of St Anthony Falls without Park Board consent, regardless of any contrary requirement in Park Board resolutions.”
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) License Article 404
“During low flows in July and August, the project will operate with up to 500 cfs during the daylight hours even if it dries up the falls . . . “
Crown Hydro, LLC
“CHC acknowledges that its project may endanger MPRB owned historic facilities..."
National Trust for Historic Preservation (May 2011)
The National Trust for Historic Preservation is deeply concerned to learn about the proposal of S.F. 1191, which requires the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) to approve a lease agreement for a hydroelectric facility on their property no later than May 31, 2011. It is our opinion that this legislation will only harm Minnesota’s natural resources, and it could have unintended and very negative consequences on effective local government regulatory processes.
The Crown Hydro hydroelectric project is obviously the intended beneficiary of this legislation, since this project’s request for use of Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (“Park Board”) property in the St. Anthony Falls Historic District was denied. Repeated challenges to this decision have only reinforced the appropriateness of the Park Board’s decisions to deny a permit for a new hydroelectric facility on Park Board land in a highly-visible and sensitive area of the riverfront that contains many natural and historic resources.
While we strongly support renewable energy production through alternative sources such as wind, geothermal, and hydroelectric power, we do not support the destruction of our state’s limited and nonrenewable cultural resources for the creation of renewable energy. Although this project has been many years in development, we have yet to see the full plans for the Crown Hydro project or comprehensive evaluation of the impact it will have on the Mill Ruins area. It is clear that this project requires significant environmental review before it can move forward, so as not to destroy one nonrenewable resource for the benefit of renewable energy generation, which could feasibly be located elsewhere.
We also feel strongly that Minnesota’s natural resources should be utilized in ways that are effective and sustainable. Based upon an analysis of the project by engineer John Gulliver (attached), the proposed location for the Crown Hydro project is very problematic. His assessment concludes that “energy generation projections of Crown Hydro LLC are optimistic and the risks are ignored.” In addition, the flow of water over the St. Anthony Falls will be significantly reduced by the operation of the Crown Hydro project. This will eliminate the defining feature of the St. Anthony Falls Historic District and compromise one of Minneapolis’ most prominent viewsheds.
Most importantly, the proposed legislation will deliberately subvert the regulatory review processes established to ensure a thorough and transparent public process based on established criteria. Approving S.F. 1191 would greatly diminish the ability of local government and state agencies to assess the appropriateness of proposed projects on property that has been set aside for public use and benefit.
For all of these reasons, we respectfully request that you do not support S.F. 1191.
Christina Morris
Minnesota Program Officer
National Trust for Historic Preservation
How Can This NOT Be Unconstitutional?
Could it be anymore unambigous?
From Article XII of the Constitution of the State of Minnesota:
"The legislature shall pass no local or special law...granting to any private corporation, association, or individual any special or exclusive privilege, immunity or franchise whatever..."
"Short Description: Hydroelectric facility (Crown Hydro) municipal approval requirement exemption, federal regulation compliance, and Minneapolis park and recreation board approval"
This legislation is intended for the sole benefit of Crown Hydro, LLC in direct conflict with the Constitution of the State of Minnesota.
About This Series Kim and I walked down to check out the location of the Crown Hydro project located in Mill Ruins Park at St. Anthony Falls. The proximity to the Stone Arch Bridge and other important historical treasures surprised us, so I thought I'd take a rough measure - I'd "step it off". It was 49 steps from the center of the proposed Hydroelectric facility to the foot of the Stone Arch Bridge. I decided to dig a little deeper. This 5 part series is the result of that effort.
The mission of The Fit Tourist is to introduce tourists to our fabulous trail systems while offering a safe, healthy and memorable ride. However, you don't literally have to be a tourist to take advantage of this service. For example, people new to our neighborhood might want to take the "Downtown Extravaganza" ride to get a lay of the land before venturing out on a Nice Ride or even their own bike.
Check out their website for route details, ride times, registration info, what to expect, etc.